Anger is upsetting to smarm—real anger, not umbrage. But so is humor and confidence. Smarm, with its fixation on respect and respectability, has trouble handling it when the snarkers start clowning around. Are you serious? the commenters write. Is this serious? On Twitter, the right-thinking commenters pass the links around: Seriously?
— Tom Scocca, On Smarm
Douchebag Brainwaves is a blog consisting of automatically generated text. It's generated by my own Markov chain–based text generator after training it on the essays of Paul Graham. I take Paul Graham to be the titular douchebag of the blog, and think that this is a fair description of his own character as it's shown in those essays (though you may, of course, feel differently). The code that actually creates the individual posts by calling the text generator is available here, if you'd like to look at it.
So: this blog is consists of
essays created by algorithmically recombining phrases based on a mathematical model created by analyzing the essays Graham has published on his website. Though the occasional phrase written by Graham himself may pop up, this is not in itself appropriation; it's just that the text is generated by performing the virtual equivalent of flipping coins, and occasionally the virtual coin-tosses result in the happenstance production of the original text on which the generator was trained. (Of course, the virtual coin flips are also constrained by the fact that they're traversing chains constructed from Graham's own writing, so it's not precisely the same as the proverbial monkeys banging on typewriters, either.)
Every text is a network of roads taken and not taken. Some of the roads have never been taken, so far as we know, and of the roads known to have been taken, some are well traveled and some hardly traveled at all. Who traveled which roads, and when, and where, are matters of consequence to anyone studying the texts. Roads identical in one respect or another may be seen as very different roads if viewed from a different vantake—and of those different points of view, many will be possible. […] We don’t want to discover what the texts mean but what they might be imagined to mean or to have meant. Those meanings are a function of what texts might or might not do, given their rules of engagement; and those rules are determined from what they have and have not done, as well as what they might have done or might be made to do given their historical descent.
— Jerome McGann, conclusion to Radiant Textuality: Literature After the World Wide Web (p. 152 in ISBN 1-4039-6436-X)
Well, several reasons:
deformative reading, which throws features of the source text into relief that have previously been invisible.
This is a primary motivation for many of my other textual recombination projects: it shows me new things about the texts that I already know well (or fairly well). This is, for instance, the case with my other blogs Ulysses Redux and The Worst of Bad Lovecraft, both of which have shown me a great deal about the texts that they consume and remix.
This rarity of statements, the incomplete, fragmented form of the enunciative field, the fact that few things, in all, can be said, explain that statements are not, like the air we breathe, an infinite transparency; but things that are transmitted and preserved, that have value, and which one tries to appropriate; that are repeated, reproduced, and transformed; to which pre-established networks are adapted, and to which a status is given in the institutions; things that are duplicated not only by copy or translation, but by exegesis, commentary, and the internal proliferation of meaning.
— Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge
brainwave posted on the blog consists of:
essayof two or more paragraphs, created by the text generator that has been trained on the bodies of Graham's essays.
notesto accompany the text of the essay.