Links and Notes

A series of links to info about specific topics. Rather disorganized. Profoundly incomplete. Frequently updated.

Film exposure

Expired film:
- EM's How to shoot expired film on emulsive.org.

Developing information

General time-temp-agitation resources:
- Massive Dev Chart at DigitalTruth
- Film Development Chart at Darkroom Solutions
- Recipe Finder at FilmDev.org
Development techniques:
- Danny Lennox Bronson's Zone System for Roll film.
- Alex Luyckx on developing unknown film.
- Forum discussion: what is a compensating developer? with discussion of how the chemistry works.
- Push-processing:
  - The Massive Dev Chart's general recommendations for pushing.
- Stand development:
  - Me talking about stand development on social media:
    - 7 Dec 2020 on Reddit.
  - Denis Olivier on stand development.
  - DragonTW in Lomography Magazine's intro to stand-development, using HC-110 and LC-29.
  - Damien Trolard's intro to stand development using Rodinal, HC-110, and LC-29.
  - Forum discussion on chemistry and merits at L-Camera-Forum.
  - Intro to stand development on ArtByPino's film photography blog, with recipes for Rodinal, HC-110, Ilfosol 3, Ilford DDX, and 510 Pyro.
  - Intro to stand development on She Shoots Film.
  - Stand-development in Rodinal/HC-110, general intro with back-of-envelope economics calculations, ca. 2018.
  - Extensive technical notes on multiple stand-development experiments using different developers, with notes on relations to Zone System exposure values.
  - Stand Development: A Complete Guide to Film Developing, from Champika Wijerathne.
  - Thread on stand development at Reddit's r/AnalogCommunity.
  - Question about pushing and stand development on Photography StackExchange.
  - Rodinal-specific:
    - Pushing many stops in Rodinal at David Shoots Film.
    - Rodinal stand problem debugging thread at Digital Photography Review forums.
    - Intro to Rodinal stand development, from MrLeica.
  - HC-110-specific:
    - Parallax Photographic Co-op's intro to HC-110 1+119 full stand for 60:00.
    - Rick at He Shoots Film's recipe uses 1+119 for a 45:00 full stand.
    - HJL's intro to HC-110 1+160 semi-stand for 45:00.
    - Forum discussion on Flickr on HC-110 stand development.
    - Albert Cornelissen on stand-developing New Classic 400 in HC-110 1+31 for 60:00.
    - Ludwig Hagelstein's Unofficial HC-110 Helper calculates development times for stand-developing in different circumstances.
  - Pyrocat-specific:
    - Pyrocat-stand experiment forum thread at F295.org.
    - Notes on 510 Pyro at 5x4.co.uk.
Developing chemicals
- Developers:
  - Film Photography Project's Intro to developers.
  - Kodak-to-Ilford developer conversion chart.
  - Caffenol:
    - The Caffenol Cookbook & Bible.
  - Kodak / Cinestill / Bellini D96:
    - Overview notes: Low-contrast developer originally intended for cinematographic film. Often recommended for Double-X.
    - Bellini data sheet.
    - Bellini safety data sheet.
    - Cinestil dev chart for multiple films.
    - Review from Alex Luyckx.
    - Photrio thread comparing it to D76 and D97.
    - Sources:
      - powdered developer from Film Photography Project.
      - One-liter stock solution from Freestyle Photo.
    - Recipe: at SilverAndLight.no; at spaq.in.
  - Kodak HC-110:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
    - The Kodak HC-110 developer unofficial resources page.
    - Sources:
      - at National Camera Exchange, Golden Valley, MN
      - at Adorama
  - Rodinal:
    - Sources:
      - at Adorama
      - at Freestyle Photo
    - Simon King's My Approach to Rodinal Semi-Stand Development.
    - Parodinal:
      - Parodinal write-up from Only Images.

Films, organized by manufacturer and film type

Adox CMS II B/W 20
- Normal development procedure: not yet established.
- Successful development procedures:
  - Rodinal 1+75 semi-stand, 20x agitations over first 30 seconds, then 5x at 40:00. (Still pretty high-contrast.)
- Unsuccessful development procedures:
  - Caffenol CL semi-stand: still too much contrast, with virtually no shadow and highlight detail and strong exaggeration of lens vignetting. Not likely to be substantially better on a future roll with some exposure and development routine. Rating and exposing the film at EI 6 or 8 might help, though.
- Development notes: manufacturer claims film cannot be developed in standard developers. Later this is reduced to "should not and we cannot guarantee," etc. Apparently, film ISO varies greatly depending on developer used.
- Links:
  - Manufacturer notes.
- Rolls developed:
  - 1219, 1252, 1257, in Rodinal.
  - 1222, in Caffenol CL.
Adox CHS 100 II
- Normal development procedure: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
- Rolls developed successfully:
  - HC-110 1+119, 60:00, 40x/10x:
    - 1385, 1404: moderately high contrast, fine grain, good highlight and shadow detail.
Adox Scala 50
- Note: This is the same film as Adox HR-50; it is simply marked differently to make it clear it is for reversal processing. (Source.)
- Links:
  - Manufacturer info page.
Agfa Copex
- Successful developing attempts:
  - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 40x/10x:
    - 1391, 1408: clean, moderately high contrast, very fine grain.
Arista Pro EDU 100
- Widely believed to just be Fomapan 100 (q.v.) (e.g., source).
Arista EDU Ultra 400
- Widely believed to just be Fomapan 400 (q.v.) (e.g., source).
Bergger Pancro 400
- Normal development procedure: not yet established.
- Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
  - D-76 stock, 9 minutes.
  - D-76 1+1, 17 minutes.
  - Rodinal 1+25, 8 minutes.
- Rolls developed:
  - Rodinal 1+82, 60:00, 20x/5x:
    - 1208 </ul>
    - Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/1x:
      - 1262: slightly overdeveloped.
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+75, 80:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1216: Underdeveloped or underexposed; low contrast. (Probably the fault is not in the development procedure itself, but in the fact that the film was badly underexposed, even with the assumption of a two-stop push. Alternately, maybe the film just shouldn't be pushed two stops.)
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+77, 80:00:
      - 1278.
    - Caffenol CL, 70:00, 40x/15x:
      - 1237: better grain than in Rodinal, but still grainy; shadows are underexposed or perhaps underdeveloped.
  - Development notes: requires extra fix and rinsing; see manufacturer data sheet.
  - Next development attempt: Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand for 70:00, agitate 20x over first 30 seconds, 1x at 35:00.
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - fs999 on Photrio: 70 minutes in Caffenol CL at 58 Fahrenheit
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet, including details on fixing and washing.
    - FilmDev.org recommendation for developing: 1-hour semi-stand in Rodinal 1+100 w/ 1 inversion at 30 minutes.
    - Caffenol CM discussion.
    - Caffenol CL and Rodinal compared.
    - Review, with emphasis on comparison to HP5+.
    - Review, with emphasis on comparing to JCH street pan 400.
- CatLABS X Film 320
  - Vendor info page.
  - Figital Revolution claims that this is rebranded Eastman Double-X 5222 (q.v.), though this identification seems dubious to me: I don't have the Eastman 5222 markings on any of the rolls of X Film I've developed. It is a similar-looking film stock, though.
  - Standard development procedure: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Rolls developed more or less successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1357: Film is muddy and underexposed, probably because most of it was shot with a red filter over the lens, which seems to have fuddled the exposure meter.
      - 1363: beautiful results in an outdoor graveyard: nice tonal separation, even with greens; fine grain; medium contrast.
  - Manufacturer development suggestions:
    - D76 (stock), 6 min
    - D76 1+1, 10 min
    - Rodinal 1+50, 19 min
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9 min
- Cinestill B/W XX
  - See Eastman Double-X 5222.
- Eastman Double-X 5222
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established. Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand at 60:00 is slightly over-developed for a roll exposed at EI 250. If this is the film CatLABS is marketing as X-320, perhaps they have the right idea when they rate it as this speed.
  - Rolls developed:
    - as Cinestill B/W XX:
      - semi-stand developed in Rodinal 1+100: 1254, 1267.
    - as Eastman Double-X:
      - semi-stand developed in Rodinal 1+100: 1299.
      - Rodinal 1+50 with standard agitation for 9:00: 1306: too grainy, stand development seems to do be better, though it might need to be exposed at a higher EI.
  - Developing suggestions:
    - SheShootsFilm suggests 30:00 in Caffenol CL with agitations 3x at 1, 5, 15.
  - Links:
    - Data sheet from Kodak.
    - B/W movie film processing notes from Kodak.
- Eastman 2366
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Available as:
    - Film Photography Project Low ISO film (24 exp. for $10).
    - Two thousand-foot roll for ~$600 at B & H Photo & Video
  - Shooting notes: highly orthochromatic, restricted to blue-violet end of the spectrum. (Use of blue filter might help with metering?)
  - Successful developments:
    - in Rodinal:
      - 1244 (1+100 semi-stand)
  - Partially successful developing attempts:
    - 1228 in Rodinal (very contrasty; needed extra exposure, maybe?)
  - Future development attempts: another developer? D96 and HC-110 are both mentioned with a fair amount of frequency, and Xtol gets mentions, too; perhaps others; more research needed.
  - Links:
    - Data sheet from Kodak
    - Review by Alex Luyckx
    - Review at Casual Photofile
- Film Ferrania P30:
  - Manufacturer data.
  - Shooting notes: relatively high contrast, ISO 80, each film uniquely coded.
  - Reviews:
    - at TheDarkroom.
    - at Japan Camera Hunter.
    - sample photos at Lomography.
    - at Blue Moon Camera Codex (with substantial exposure and processing suggestions).
    - from Gregory Crouch.
    - from Jeff Hammond.
    - Dave Whenham's one-roll review, with notes on Rodinal stand and scanning.
  - Available at:
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1356: Relatively high contrast; good shadow and highlight detail; emphasizes lines and forms.
      - 1367: High contrast, muddy greens. Low grain. Good for stonework in the graveyard but not for graveyard shots in general.
      - 1371, 1412, 1417: High contrast, low grain. Less exposure latitude than I'd like when including the sky. Nice, visible textures on concrete and brickwork.
      - 1390 / 1405: Moderately contrasty. Appropriately developed, but much of roll focuses on subject matter not really well suited for this film.
  - Developing suggestions:
    - From the Massive Dev Chart:
      - HC-110, dil. B, 5:00
      - HC-110, dil. H, 12:00
      - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 6:00
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00
    - Gregory Crouch suggests Rodinal 1+50, 14:00.
    - Dave Whenham got results he liked with a Rodinal (full stand? semi-stand?) 1+100 (?) for sixty minutes.
- Film Photography Project Derev Pan (ISO 400)
  - Standard developing process:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x
  - FPP info page
  - Reviews:
    - on the Random Camera Blog.
    - at TheDarkroom.
  - Rolls developed:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1348: Clean, pleasant response curve; good separation between greens; fine to medium grain; crisp and clean.
      - 1373: Clean; pleasant response curve; fine grain. Nice metal and wood textures.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - D76 stock: 8 minutes
    - D76 1:1: 10.5 minutes
    - HC 110, Dil. H: 10.5 minutes
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - From Massive Dev Chart: HC-110 dilution B (1+31 from concentrate) for 10.5 minutes
    - Alex Luychx suggests HC-110 1+150 stand development for 45:00, with minimum 6mL per roll.
- Film Photography Project Dracula 35 (ISO 64)
  - Apparently this is Svema FN64 (q.v.).
  - Links:
    - FPP info page.
- Film Photography Project Low ISO Black & White 6
  - This film is repackaged Eastman 2366 (q.v.).
- Film Photography Project Street Candy ATM 400
  - Actually a surveillance film apparently used in ATMs.
  - Normal development procedure: Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/10x.
  - Developing notes:
    - Vendor claims that processing as HP5+ is a good starting point.
  - Shooting notes:
    - Vendor claims it can be pushed up to two stops; seems like elsewhere I've seen that pushing doesn't work well here.
    - Vendor says to downrate to 320 ISO under tungsten light.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1258.
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+77, 80:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1279: low contrast but workable; not really a great film for pushing.
  - Links:
    - Vendor info page.
    - FPP info page.
    - review on OnFilmOnly.
    - review at One Roll Review.
- Film Photography Project Wolfman 35
  - Shooting notes: ISO 100 cine-like film.
  - Developing suggestions:
    - D76 (stock): 6–7 min.
    - D76 (1+1): 10 min.
    - D96 (Stock): 7 minutes
    - HC-110, dilution B (1+31): 6 min.
    - HC-110, dilution H (1+63): 12 min.
    - Rodinal 1+25: 4 min.
    - Rodinal 1+50: 8–9 min.
    - Rodinal 1+100: 18 min.
  - Links:
    - Vendor info page.
    - Reviews:
      - Review from Photo Basecamp.
      - Review from Analogue Wonderland.
- Film Photography Project X²
  - This is repackaged Eastman Double-X 5222 (q.v.)
- Film Washi A
  - Orthochromatic B/W duplicating film at ISO 12.
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Unsuccessful developing attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand: 1284.
  - Next developing attempt: probably something strictly adhering to manufacturer instructions.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Rodinal 1+50, 13 min.
    - D-76 1+1, 9 min.
    - Xtol stock, 5.5 min.
    - Suggested starting point for other developers: treat as Ilford Delta 400.
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests semi-stand in Rodinal 1+100 for 90 minutes at 18℃ with continuous agiatation for first 30–60 seconds and 1–3 agitations during the rest of development—that's approximately 75 minutes at 20℃.
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests, for Ilford Delta 400, semi-stand development with 30–60 sec. initial agitation and then agitation every 5–10 minutes to a total of 36 minutes.
    - Single photo on Flickr stand-developed in Rodinal 1+100. Another at 1+50. Neither has a development time or agitation schedule listed.
  - Shooting notes (from manufacturer data sheet):
    - Load in shadow to avoid light piping.
    - Easy to overexpose the sky in outdoor scenes.
    - Low sensitivity to tungsten light; indoor shooting using incandescent blubs not recommended.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
- Film Washi F
  - Shooting notes:
    - Medical fluorographic X-ray film at ISO 100.
    - Load in shadow, shoot six initial shots to avoid light piping.
      - Note: light piping is no joke here.
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Partially successful development attempts:
    - HC-110 1+15, 5:00, 20x/5x every 30 sec:
      - 1403: still plenty of light piping, and extreme adjustments to the gray midpoint are necessary, but some shots came out quite nicely here.
  - Unsuccessful development procedures:
    - unknown development procedure: 1281.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00, 15x/5x every 30 sec: 1331, 1370. (Badly overdeveloped.)
    - HC-110 1+15, 5:00, 20x/5x every thirty seconds: 1410: all highlights are blown out, nothing usable on this roll.
  - Next development attempt: Possibly a clip test, splitting an exposed roll into multiple strips, accepting the loss of negatives, and trying HC-110 dil. A with standard agitation, HC-110 stand, the Massive Dev Chart's semi-stand for 42 minutes for FP4+, and Caffenol?
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9 min.
    - D-76 1+1, 11 min.
    - HC-110 dilution A, 4.5 min.
    - Suggested starting point for other developers: treat as Ilford FP4 [sic.: not FP4+, either intentionally or not].
  - Other development suggestions:
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests Rodinal 1+25 with standard agitation schedule for 9 minutes.
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests, for Ilford FP4+, a Rodinal 1+100 42-minute semi-stand with 30–60 sec. initial agitation and 1–3 more agitation periods through the rest of the development cycle.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
- Film Washi S
  - Panchromatic (but not fully red-sensitive) sound-recording film at ISO 50.
  - Normal development procedure: Rodinal 1+25, 11:00, 15x / 5x every 30 sec.
  - Successful developing attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 11:00, 15x / 5x every 30 sec: 1361, 1369 / 1407.
  - Moderately successful developing attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand: 1285.
  - Unsuccessful development attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00, with standard agitation schedule: 1300 (underdeveloped, too contrasty).
    - Rodinal 1+25, 11:00, 15x / 5x every 30 sec: 1394: development was fine, as shown by two other rolls of successfully developed Washi S in the same tank at the same time, but the exposure was off because the entire venue was in shadow.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 7.5 min.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 11 min.
    - D-76 1+1, 9.5 min.
    - Xtol stock, 7 min.
    - Suggested starting point for other developers: treat as Kodak Tri-X at EI 400.
  - Other development suggestions:
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests Rodinal 1+25 with standard agitation schedule for 11 minutes.
    - Phil Harrison says the lab he sent it to did a 45-minute stand in Rodinal 1+100.
    - Alex Luyckx tried (and found acceptable):
      - Kodak D-76 1+1 for 9.5 minutes
      - Kodak HC-110, dilution H, for 9 minutes
      - Rodinal 1+25, for 11 minutes (and hypthetically suggests Rodinal 1+200 true stand for 60 minutes)
    - Massive Dev Chart suggests (for Tri-X at EI 400) Rodinal 1+100 non-stand for 24 minutes with continuous agitation first 30 sec., then 10 sec. of every 30 thereafter.
    - Quasi-anonymous suggestion at Filmdev.org suggests 1+100 Rodinal semi-stand for 60:00, but says ISO 12: not sure if the poster is suggesting it be overexposed four stops to develop with Rodinal or is conflating it with Washi A.
  - Shooting notes (from manufacturer data sheet)
    - load in shadow.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
    - Review by Phil Harrison.
    - Review by Alex Luyckx.
    - Single photo indicating 1+100 Rodinal stand.
- Film Washi Z
  - Shooting notes: distinguishes different shades of green clearly; near-infrared; dark red filter recommended to enhance infrared effect.
  - Developed successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1349: Great landscapes with good separation between greens; landscapes have an intensely spectral quality.
  - Reviews:
    - at Analogue Wonderland.
    - from Alex Luyckx.
  - Other links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
  - Sources:
    - at Freestyle Photo (US$12.99/24 exp. 35mm on 14 Jan 2024.)
    - at Thirty Nine Photo Shop (US$10/24 exp. 35mm on 14 Jan 2024.)
    - at The Find Lab (US$12.18/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at FotoImplex.de (€8.50/24 exp. 35mm on 14 Jan 2024.)
    - at Analogue Wonderland (£8.50 on 14 Jan 2024.)
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 4:30
    - D-76 stock, 10:00
    - Rodinal 1+25, 7:00
    - for unlisted developers, manufacturer recommendation is to treat as Ilford Delta 400.
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - from the Massive Dev Chart:
      - Caffenol CM stock, 20:00
      - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00
    - Alex Luyckx says that he loved HC-110 dilution H for 15:00.
    - Alex Luyckx says that he loved Rodinal 1+50 for 20:00.
- Fomapan 100 Classic
  - Widely distributed under many different names, including Lomography Earl Gray and Arista .EDU 100.
    - Here is an article from the Kosmo Foto guy on selling rebranded Fomapan.
  - Normal development procedure: Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand for 50 minutes, agitate 20x over first thirty seconds, then 5x halfway.
  - Development settings to try: Caffenol CL stand for 55:00.
  - Unsuccessful developments: Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand for 60:00 is overdeveloped but retrievable. Rodinal 1+77 is overdeveloped.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - ID-11 / D-76 stock, 6:00–7:00.
    - ID-11 / D-76 1:1, 8:00–10:00.
    - Rodinal 1:25, 3:30.
  - Development notes:
    - The Massive Dev Chart recommends Rodinal 1+100 at 120 minutes.
    - Darkroom Solutions recommends 70 minutes in Caffenol CL.
    - Caffenol.org recommends 7-8 minutes in Caffenol Harmony.
  - Rolls developed:
    - As Arista .EDU 100:
      - Rodinal 1+77 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
        
        1235: 1 + 77 is probably over-developing.
      - Rodinal 1+82 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1211.
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1217.
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/½x:
        
        1260.
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand for 60:00, 20x / 10x:
        
        1335: Really beautiful results, nice landscape photos, crisp, even response curve.
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, 35x/20x:
        
        1336: Clean, pleasant grain, nice response curve.
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/15x:
        
        1240.
    - As Lomography Earl Gray:
      - 1241/1242, 1246/1247/1248/1249, in Caffenol CL.
    - As Fomapan:
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 50:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1283, 1292.
        
        1318: beautiful results.
      - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1419: Nice contrast, still very crisp, nice solid shadows. Plenty of detail all across the brightness spectrum.
  - Reviews and notes:
    - Review: Fomapan 100 in Caffenol CL.
- Fomapan Action 400
  - Widely distributed under many different names, including Lomography Lady Gray, Arista .EDU 400, Holga film, and Kosmo Foto.
    - Here is an article from the Kosmo Foto guy on selling rebranded Fomapan.
  - Normal development procedure: Rodinal 1+100, 50:00, 20x/5x or 40x/10x.
  - Rolls developed:
    - in Sprint Systems standard chemistry:
      - 1052, 1053, 1054 (1051 and 1055?) (branded as Fomapan): worked just fine.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 50:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1271 (branded as Lady Grey): just about perfect.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1212 (branded as Arista .EDU): not quite enough agitation.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1342 (branded as Holga 400): venue was so dark it didn't work well, but there were some usable shots.
      - 1343 (branded as Holga 400): really good results, despite the relatively dark concert venue.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/1x:
      - 1269 (branded as Arista .EDU): hard to judge development; film seems to have been underexposed.
      - 1263 / 1265 (branded as Lady Grey): basically works well, though this film/dev combo has relatively low dynamic range and this spoils more than a few shots.
    - in Caffenol CL, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1224 (branded as Arista .EDU): large grain.
      - 1341 (branded as Holga 400): the venue was too dark for this film/dev combo to work.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1355 (branded as Holga 400): Clean, crisp, neutral, fine grain for the film speed.
      - 1360 (branded as New Classic EZ 400): Clean, crisp, neutral, fine grain for the film speed.
    - exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+77, 80:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1276 (branded as Arista .EDU): looks good!
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+100, 120:00, 40x/1x:
      - 1329 (branded as Holga 400): crisp and relatively contrasty; sharp. Surprisingly good for how far back I was and how dark the venue was.
    - exposed at EI 1600, HC-110 1+119, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1297 (branded as Arista .EDU): underdeveloped.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - ID-11 / D-76 stock, 7:00–8:00.
    - ID-11 / D-76 1:1, 12:00–13:00.
    - HC-110 1:31, 6:30.
    - Rodinal 1:25, 5:30.
- Fuji Acros II Neopan 100
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page and data sheet.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Kodak D-76 1:1, 10:30
- Fujicolor 200
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Last rolls developed: 1159
- Fujicolor Superia X-tra 400
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Last rolls developed: 1159
- Fuji Provia 100F
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Last rolls developed: 1199/1202
- Fuji Velvia 100
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Last rolls developed: 1173
- Holga 400
  - This is apparently the same as Fomapan 400 (q.v.).
- Ilford Delta 100
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 12:00.
    - ID-11 stock, 8:30; 1+1, 11:00.
    - D-76 stock, 9:00, 1+1, 12:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 5:00; 1+14, 7:30.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00; 1+50, 14:00.
  - Last rolls developed: 1134/1135
- Ilford Delta 400
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 8:00.
    - ID-11 / D-76 stock, 9:30; 1+1, 14:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 7:00; 1+14, 12:00.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00; 1+50, 20:00.
  - Last roll developed: 1186
- Ilford Delta 3200
  - Normal development procedure:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 8:45 or 9:00.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - in Rodinal 1+22, 8:45, with standard agitation schedule: 1195/1198.
    - in Rodinal 1+25, 9:00, with standard agitation schedule: 1294, 1374, 1376, 1413.
    - in Rodinal 1+100, semi-stand development for 80:00: 1255.
  - Less satisfactory development experiments:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand with very gentle agitations.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 11:00, 15x / 5x every 30 sec: 1415 / 1416: negatives are rather thin, though not completely unusable.
  - Links:
    - Several photographers compare Ilford Delta 3200 and Kodak TMax P3200.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 9:30.
    - ID-11 stock, 10:30.
    - D-76 stock, 10:30.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 11:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+15, 17:00.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 11:00.
- Ilford FP4+
  - Normal development procedure: HC-110 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x.
  - Rolls developed less successfully:
    - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/10x:
      - 1185/1187: overdeveloped.
    - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1274/1275: still overdeveloped, though not as much so as with more agitation.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00, 15x/5x every 30 sec:
      - 1345. Nice, clean roll, though there are small bits of uneven development in places. Could use more agitation, and this roll in particular would benefit from having stand development compress its dynamic range.
    - Rodinal 1+77 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1401: Moderately successful, but some sprocket surge and not quite enough contrast. Needs more agitation.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1338, 1339: clean, solid, pleasant tones, low grain.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1344: surprisingly good results for FP4+ shot at box speed inside at a concert. Stand development really seems to have paid off here.
      - 1395: really beautiful roll. There are places where it looks like holding back the highlights a little with the lower agitation schedule might have helped, though. Might also be worthwhile reducing the development time somewhat.
    - unknown development procedure:
      - 1282p.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 10:00.
    - ID-11 stock, 8:30; 1+1, 11:00.
    - D-76 stock, 8:00; 1+1, 11:00.
    - HC-110 dilution B, 9:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 4:15; no recommendation for 1+14.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 9:00.
- Ilford HP5+
  - Normal development procedure:
    - Exposed at box speed:
      - Caffenol CL: 60:00, agitate 20x over first thirty seconds, then 5x at 30:00.
      - Rodinal 1+70: 60:00, agitate 40x over first minute, then 10x at 30:00.
      - Rodinal 1+100?: 80:00, agitate ?40x over first minute, then ?5x halfway?
    - Exposed at EI 1600:
      - Rodinal 1+82 full stand, 120:00, 40x agitation initially, one-half agitation halfway through.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 7:00.
    - ID-11 stock, 6:00; 1+1, 11:00.
    - D-76 stock, 6:00; 1+1, 9:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 5:30; no recommendation for 1+14.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 6:00.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Caffenol CL:
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, agitating 20x / 5x:
        
        1206/1207
        
        1273
        
        1304 / 1305
        
        1308: concert lighting and stand development resulted in low contrast; might be worthwhile letting it soup longer in similar sitations in the future.
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, agitating 40x / 10x:
        
        1307: concert lighting and stand development resulted in low contrast; might be worthwhile letting it soup longer in similar sitations in the future.
      - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 70:00, agitating 40x / 15x:
        
        1225
        
        1239
      - Exposed at EI 1600, Caffenol CL semi-stand for 60:00, agitating 20x / 10x:
        
        1310: it was too dark in the first place, and Caffenol CL was not the right developer. Roll was a total loss.
    - Rodinal:
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 80:00, agitating 40x / 10x:
        
        1250/1253
        
        1264
      - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 80:00, agitating 40x / ½x:
        
        1268 / 1270: many are underdeveloped.
      - Rodinal semi-stand 1+75 for 80:00, agitating 20x / 5x:
        
        1215.
      - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+77 semi-stand, 80:00, 40x / 10x:
        
        1277 / 1296
      - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+77 semi-stand, 80:00, 40x / 1x:
        
        1298 / 1301 / 1302 / 1303
      - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+82 full stand, 120:00, 40x:
        
        1309: decent results; really, the best roll from this poorly lit concert. Still not fantastic.
        
        1313 / 1316: decent results, given the lighting situation. Texture is wonderful when lighting is adequate.
      - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+100 full stand for 120 minutes:
        
        1311 / 1315, 1312 / 1314: Lots of good results provided lighting is sufficient. Darker shots don't work well. 1+82 is better for HP5+ at EI 1600.
        
        Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+100 full stand for 120 minutes: 1326.
- Ilford PanF+
  - Normal development procedure: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Successful developing attempts:
    - HC-110 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1352: Perhaps slightly overdeveloped: maybe try 50:00 or 55:00 next time. Halation is occasionally visible: maybe more agitation next time.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1397 and 1402: development is basically solid, even though many shots in the 1397 were underexposed. 1402 shows some sprocket surge and plenty of halation.
      - 1406: just not enough contrast in the negatives, I think.
  - Semi-successful development attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1205.
    - Rodinal 1+77, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1401: Moderately successful, but some sprocket surge and not quite enough contrast. Needs more agitation.
  - Unsuccessful development attempts:
    - Caffenol CL, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1226.
    - after long post-exposure wait: Rodinal 1+100, 50:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1286.
    - Rodinal 1+100 full stand, perhaps not enough total Rodinal in tank:
      - 1337: badly underdeveloped.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1362: badly underdeveloped.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - ID-11 / D-76 stock, 6:30; 1+1, 8:30.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+14, 4:30.
    - Rodinal 1+25, 6:00; 1+50, 11:00.
- Ilford Ortho Plus
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Unsatisfactory development attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x: 1251: overexposed and/or overdeveloped.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/5x: 1409: Badly overdeveloped or overexposed.
  - Next development attempt: different developer? And possibly exposing at EI 40?
- Ilford SFX 200
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Last roll developed: 1061 (no write-up available)
  - Unsatisfactory development techniques:
    - Exposed at EI 800, then pushed three stops in Sprint Systems chemistry.
- Japan Camera Hunter JCH Street Pan 400
  - Shooting notes: high-contrast; deep rich blacks; clean whites; near-IR sensitivity; very noticeable grain.
  - Developing notes: emulsion is quite easy to damage.
  - Standard developing procedure: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Rolls developed more or less successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1354: Relatively low dynamic range; moderately good separation between greens; noticeable grain.
      - 1359: Shooting situation was too dark for this film stock to work. Probably should have been pushed to EI 1600.
      - 1364: even response curve, nice grain, decent separation of tones, including greens.
  - Rolls developed unsuccessfully:
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Caffenol CL 70:00 semi-stand:
      - 1424: Painfully underdeveloped ant totally unusable.
  - Manufacturer development suggestions:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 10:30
    - Rodinal 1+50, 22:00
    - Ilfosol 3 1+3, 5:00
    - HC-110, dil. B, 5:00
  - Apparently it is an Agfa traffic surveillance film that had previously been discontinued.
  - Manufacturer info page.
  - Reviews:
    - at TheDarkroom.
    - at Analog.Cafe.
    - Sample photos at Lomography sales page.
    - at My Favorite Lens.
    - at Emulsive.org (review of sheet-film version).
    - at Street Silhouettes.
    - at Casual Photophile.
    - at The Phoblographer.
  - Available from:
    - Cinestill.
    - Freestyle Photo.
- Kentmere Pan 100
  - Normal development procedure:
    - At EI 100: Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x.
    - At EI 400: Rodinal 1+75 semi-stand, 80:00, 20x/5x.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Rodinal 1+82, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1210
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1214/1217: basically good.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1230.
    - Exposed at EI 400, Rodinal 1+75, 80:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1221: basically workable, except for low dynamic range and patches of uneven development.
    - Caffenol CL, 55:00, 40x/15x:
      - 1245: overexposed, perhaps? Compared to other CCL developments, this shouldn't be looking overdeveloped. Sand is blown out.
    - Caffenol CL, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1229: uneven development, some halation: more agitation or time needed, I think.
    - Caffenol CL, 70:00, 40x/15x:
      - 1238: pretty good; still some halation visible.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 10:30.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 5:00.
    - Ilfosol 3 1+14, 7:30.
    - ID-11 stock, 9:00.
    - ID-11 1+1, 11:30.
    - ID-11 1+3, 21:00.
  - A fairly common rumor (e.g., here) is that this is the same stock as Ilford Pan (not Delta) 100.
- Kentmere Pan 400
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Successful development attempts:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 20x agitations in first 0:00:30, then 5x at 30:00. — still mildly underdeveloped.
    - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 40x agitations in first 0:01:00, then 10x at 30:00. — really really crisp.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - DD-X 1+4, 11:30
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 6:30
    - Ilfosol 3 1+14, 11:00
    - ID-11 stock, 9:30
    - ID-11 1+1, 16:30
    - ID-11 1+3, 25:30
  - Rolls developed:
    - Rodinal 1+82 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1209.
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/½x:
      - 1266.
      - 1340: great outdoor shots during the day, not good enough at night on poorly lit streets or dark concert hall.
    - exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+82 full stand, 120:00, 40x:
      - 1321: decent results; maybe more agitation would help, or maybe HP5+ just pushes to 1600 better.
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+100 full stand, 120:00, 45x:
      - 1322/1327.
    - Exposed at EI 1600, Rodinal 1+100 full stand, 120:00, 40x:
      - 1323/1324/1325/1328.
    - in Caffenol CL:
      - 1223.
    - Unknown development procedure:
      - 1272 / 1291.
  - A fairly common rumor (e.g., here) is that this is the same film as Ilford Pan (not Delta) 400.
- Kodak ColorPlus 200
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Caffenol CL, 150:00 at 62℉, 20x/ 10x at 7:30, 15:00, 30:00, 45:00, 60:00, 75:00, 90:00, 105:00, 120:00, 135:00, 150:00:
      - 1136/1137: overdeveloped, high contrast, low shadow detail.
- Kodak Ektachrome E100
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Rodinal 1+75, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1232.
    - Rodinal 1+75, 70:00, 40x/1x:
      - 1293
    - Rodinal 1+75, 80:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1218.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/1x:
      - 1261: 80:00 is perhaps too long: roll 1261 was somewhat over-developed, blowing out highlights. Try 70:00 next time.
  - Development procedure changes to try:
    - ~~Color blix instead of fix? Do research first.~~ Apparently not.
    - Other developers? The thread linked above has a person suggesting Xtol or DD-X.
    - Next development: 1+100 for 70:00.
- Kodak TMax 100
  - Normal development procedure: Caffenol CL, 70:00, 15x/15x; or Rodinal 1+62, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Caffenol CL, 70:00, 15x/15x:
      - 1109/1111: solid, overall.
    - Caffenol CL, 90:00, 15x/15x/15x/15x/15x/15x:
      - 1099/1100: basically solid.
    - Caffenol CL, 90:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1163: somewhat underexposed or underdeveloped; not enough shadow detail.
    - Caffenol CL, 105:00, 15x/5x/5x/5x/5x/5x:
      - 1099/1100: basically solid.
    - Rodinal 1+62, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1174: nice response curve; good contrast.
    - Rodinal 1+75, 60:00/ 40x/10x:
      - 1177: usable, but overdeveloped.
- Kodak TMax P3200
  - Shooting info:
    - Manufacturer data sheet says nominal ISO sensitivity is 800, or 1000 if processed in Kodak TMax developer; it also says that EI 1600 yields negatives of high quality without processing changes if loss of shadow detail is acceptable.
  - Developing notes:
    - Like other TMax films, exhausts fixer more rapidly than other film does. Magenta/pink staining can indicate insufficient fixing time or fixer near exhaustion. Slight stains do not indicate problems with stability, but irregular or pronounced stans indicate film should be re-fixed.
  - Normal development procedure: HC-110 1+31, standard agitation, 12:00, 20x/5x every 30 sec.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - Exposed at EI 800, HC-110 1+31, standard agitation, 12:00, 20x/5x every 30 sec:
      - 1375: low grain for the film speed, really pleasant response curve
      - 1377: kind of grainy, still pleasant
    - Exposed at EI 3200, HC-110 1+31, 12:00, 40x/5x every 30 seconds:
      - 1414: contrasty but very usable.
      - 1418: Damn, this is grainy enough to spoil many of the shots.
      - 1422/1423: grainy but highly usable.
  - Rolls developed unsatisfactorily:
    - Exposed at EI 1000, Caffenol CL semi-stand, 70:00, 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x:
      - 1107
    - Exposed at EI 3200, Caffenol CL semi-stand, 70:00, 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x / 15x:
      - 1105
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - All times are in minutes, at 68℉ (20℃), assuming EI 800, and agitating 5x–7x initially and 5x every 30 seconds for the rest of the development time.
    - Xtol: 10½ min.
    - Xtol 1:1: 14 min.
    - D-76 (presumably stock?): 11½ min.
    - HC-110 (dil. B):8½ min.
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - Thread about TMax P3200 in Rodinal 1:100 and related questions.
    - Massive Dev Chart:
      - HC-110: EI 800, 1+31 (dil. B), 8½ min; EI 3200, 1+31, 10½ min; EI 6400, 1+31, 12 min.
      - Rodinal: EI 1000, Rodinal 1+24, 7 min; EI 3200, Rodinal 1+25, 8 min, or Rodinal 1+50, 16 min.
    - Jim Grey dislikes the way this film looks in HC-110, dil. B, but does not give further detail about his developing procedure.
    - Dmitri observes that Delta P3200 in Caffenol (C-H) gives very grainy results.
    - Comments on Reddit seem to agree that stand-developing P3200 is suboptimal.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
    - Several photographers compare Ilford Delta 3200 and Kodak TMax P3200.
- Kodak Tri-X 400
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Rolls developed: 1120
- Kono! Monolit 100
  - Standard developing procedure: HC-110 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x: 1350.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x: 1398.
  - manufacturer website.
  - Reviews:
    - Review by The Phoblographer.
    - Review at FilmPhotography.eu.
  - Sources:
    - at The Find Lab (US$11.69/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at Freestyle Photo (US$12.99/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at B&H Photo & Video (US$12.99/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at Unique Photo (US$12.99/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at Photodom (US$12.99/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at Reformed Film Lab (US$13/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at Austin Photo Lab (US$14.99/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
    - at FotoImplex (€10.90/36 exp., as of 15 Jan 2024.)
  - Manufacturer developing info.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - D-76 stock, 10:00
    - HC-110, dil. B, 10:00
    - Ilfosol 3, 1+14, 12:00
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - at FilmPhotography.eu.
  - produced with the assistance of Svema, maybe this is Foto 100 or a similar film?
- Lomographic Babylon Kino 13
  - Wikipedia says that this is Orwo DN21 (q.v.).
- Lomographic Berlin Kino 400
  - An anonymous user here claims Berlin Kino is ORWO N74 (q.v.).
- Lomographic Lomography Earl Grey 100
  - Apparently just rebranded Fomapan 100 (q.v.) (source).
- Lomographic Lomography Fantôme Kino 8
  - It is apparently rebranded Orwo DP31 (q.v.).
- Lomographic Lomography Lady Grey 400
  - Rolls encountered are probably rebranded Fomapan 400 (q.v.).
  - It is a fairly common assertion (e.g., here) that this is just rebranded TMax 400. Post-2017, it seems to be Fomapan 400 (e.g., source, source).
- Lomographic Potsdam Kino 100
  - This is apparently rebranded Orwo UN54 (q.v.).
- New Classic EZ400
  - Manufacturer info
  - Manufacturer developing info
  - Review by Jim Grey.
  - This Reddit thread suggests that the film is repackaged Fomapan 400.
- Orwo DN21
  - Wikipedia says this is the film that is packaged as Lomography Babylon Kino 13.
  - Shooting notes: Small exposure latitude, make sure you're not accidentally exposing for the sky.
  - Developing notes: Easy to scratch the emulsion. Film stock is very curly.
  - Standard developing procedure: not yet established.
  - Links:
    - Lomography vendor info page.
    - Manufacturer info page (purchase link).
    - Reviews:
      - Mastering the Babylon Kino Black and White ISO 13 Film at Lomography Magazine.
      - Lomography's gallery of photos taken with the film.
  - Sources:
    - B & H Photo & Video.
  - Rolls not developed satisfactorily:
    - As Lomography Babylon Kino:
      - Rodinal 1+50, standard agitation schedule, 9:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1319: dark and moody, came out quite scratched. Arguably underdeveloped.
        
        1332: badly underexposed, very low contrast, lots of scratching.
    - As Orwo DN21:
      - HC-110 1+31, 8:30, 20x/5x every 30 sec: 1396: unevenly developed, low dynamic range, low contrast, emulsion damaged.
- Orwo DP31
  - Shooting notes: 8-ISO, low grain, small exposure latitude. Relatively high contrast.
  - Processing notes: very curly, emulsion is easy to damage.
  - Standard processing method: HC-110 1+31, 12:00, 15x/5x every 30 seconds.
  - Rolls developed:
    - branded as Lomography Fantôme:
      - HC-110 1+31, 12:00, 15x/5x every 30 sec:
        
        1330: good contrast, good sharpness.
      - Rodinal 1+50, 9:00, 20x/5x:
        
        1346: relatively underdeveloped, most shots are much too dark.
    - Branded as Orwo DP31:
      - HC-110 1+31, 12:00, 15x/5x every 30 sec:
        
        1353: Clean, crisp, relatively high contrast, about as much dynamic range as I think I can get out of the film.
  - Manufacturer info page.
  - Available from:
    - Manufacturer as hundred-foot roll.
    - Manufacturer as 36-exposure canister.
    - Freestyle Photo as 35mm canister.
  - Also available as: Lomography Fantôme Kino 8 (q.v.).
  - Reviews:
    - from Alex Luyckx (reviewed as Lomography Fantôme Kino).
- Orwo N74
  - Sources: as Lomographic Berlin Kino.
  - Rolls developed
    - Rodinal 1+77, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1234: decently usable, but moderately overdeveloped.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 80:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1256: works pretty well, though still rather grainy.
  - Next development: maybe Caffenol CL? Do research first.
- Orwo Wolfen NP100
  - Same as UN54 with anti-halation layer. Only 36k rolls produced.
  - Standard developing process: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Manufacturer info page.
  - Manufacturer data sheet.
  - Manufacturer processing info.
  - Processing suggestion: treat as UN54?
  - Rolls successfully developed:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1347: Clean; pleasant response curve; fine grain.
      - 1368: Clean; pleasant response curve; fine grain. Nice metal and wood textures.
      - 1393, etc.: basically the same as above.
    - See also: Orwo UN54.
- Orwo Wolfen PF2
  - Shooting notes: fine-grained, orthochromatic, ISO 3.
  - Manufacturer product page.
  - Manufacturer data sheet.
  - Manufacturer processing instructions.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1358: Provided there's enough light, good results. Very fine grain, low exposure latitude, shows off lens vignetting.
  - Rolls developed unsuccessfully:
    - accidentally exposed at EI 8, Rodinal 1+77 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1365: uneven development, underdeveloped. Needs more agitation.
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/5x/5x:
      - 1372: uneven development, needs more agitation. Probably not enough total developer in the soup.
  - Available from:
    - Manufacturer (as 2000-ft 35mm roll).
    - Freestyle Photo (as 36-exp. 35mm cartridge).
  - Reviews:
    - by epoxy.
- Orwo UN54
  - Sources: Lomographic Potsdam Kino.
  - Normal development procedure: semi-stand in Rodinal 1+100 60:00, agitate 20x in first 30 seconds, agitate 5x at 30:00.
  - Next development procedure to try: slightly increase agitation.
  - An anonymous user here claims Potsdam Kino is Orwo UN54.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1220
    - Caffenol CL, 70:00, 40x/15x:
      - 1236: works pretty well.
  - Links:
    - Vendor info including recommended development times.
    - Source web page
    - Review
    - Review
    - Review at TheDarkroom.com
- Rollei Infrared
  - Shooting notes:
    - Fine grained, hyperpanchromatic, usable at ISO 400 as standard B/W film without filter.
    - With filter in 715-730 nm range, usable as infrared filter.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - D-76 (stock): 10:50
    - HC-110, dil. B (1+31): 5:00
    - Ilfosol 3 1+3: 5:00
    - Rodinal 1+25: 10:30
    - Rodinal 1+50: 22:00
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page.
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
- Rollei Ortho 25 Plus
  - Shooting notes: not red-sensitive; blue/green only: it's orthochromatic film.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page.
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
    - Reviews:
      - by Nicholas Middleton
  - Unsuccessfully developed rolls:
    - Exposed at EI 12, Rodinal 1+25, 8:30, 40x/5x every 30 sec:
      - 1366: overexposed, overdeveloped, and has even-more-developed bars across the top and bottom of each frame.
  - Plans for next-developed roll: meticulously follow manufacturer suggestions.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 5:30
    - exposed at EI 50: Rodinal 1+50, 10:00
  - Other development suggestions:
    - from the Massive Dev Chart:
      - Rodinal 1+25, 4:00
      - Rodinal 1+50, 6:00
      - HC-110, dil. B, 5:30
    - Fototobi78 on FilmDev.org suggests Caffenol CL (full stand?) for 80:00.
    - suggestions from a thread by willscarlett on photo.net:
      - HC110 for 7 min at 1:12 dilution
      - Rodinal 1:100, standard agitation schedule, 13 to 17 minutes
    - various suggestions on this thread, but the overall recommendation seems to be 3mL Rodinal at 1:100 for a sixty-minute stand.
- Rollei Retro 80S
  - Shooting notes: "near-infrared"; claims to benefit from red filter. Re-read reviews before shooting.
  - Normal development procedure: Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 50:00, 20x/5x
  - Rolls developed:
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1243.
    - Rodinal 1+75 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1233.
    - Rodinal 1+100 semi-stand, 50:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1317: beautiful results.
    - Caffenol CL semi-stand, 60:00, 35x/20x:
      - 1320/1333/1334: mostly great, contrast is a little higher than I like.
  - Other developing suggestions:
    - The Massive Dev Chart suggests Caffenol C with non-stand development for 12 minutes.
  - Links:
    - Technical data sheet.
    - Review.
    - Review.
    - Portrait-oriented review.
    - Review.
- Rollei RPX 25
  - Standard development procedure: not yet established.
  - Selected manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Rodinal 1+25, 6 minutes; Rodinal 1+50, 11 minutes.
    - ID-11 1+1, 8 minutes.
    - D-76 1+1, 8 minutes.
    - HC-110 B (1+31), 5 minutes.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Caffenol CL, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1231: basically good, but contrast is high.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1213: unveven development and halation; needs more agitation.
  - Links:
    - Review
- Rollei RPX 100
  - Standard development procedure: HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 40x/10x.
  - Rolls developed successfully:
    - HC-110 1+119 semi-stand, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1384: moderately high contrast, fine grain, good highlight and shadow detail.
      - 1392: great tone curve, relatively low grain, beautiful shadow detail; highlights rather blown out in a few places.
      - 1420/1421: Nice contrast, very crisp, solid shadows. Plenty of detail all across the brightness spectrum.
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page.
    - Manufacturer data sheet.
    - Reviews:
      - Film Friday review.
      - One-Roll Review.
      - Review from Alex Luychkx.
      - Review by Geoff Chaplin, with emphasis on comparison to Adox Silvermax.
    - Sources:
      - Midwest Photo ($7.49 on 21 Feb 2024)
      - B&H Photo & Video ($7.99 on 21 Feb 2024)
      - Reformed Film Lab ($8.00 on 21 Feb 2024)
      - hundred-foot roll from Richard Photo Lab ($99.99 on 21 Feb 2024)
- Rollei RPX 400
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page and data sheet.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Ilfosol 3 1+9, 6:30
    - Ilfosol 3 1+14, 11:00
    - Kodak D-76 stock, 8:00
    - Kodak D-76 1+1, 14:00
    - Kodak D-76 1+3, 18:00
    - Kodak HC-110 1+31, 6:00
    - Rodinal 1+25, 12:00
    - Rodinal 1+50, 21:00
- Rollei Superpan 200
  - Links:
    - Manufacturer info page and data sheet.
  - Manufacturer developing suggestions:
    - Ilfosol 3, 1+9, 7:30
    - Kodak D-76, stock, 10:00
    - Kodak D-76, 1+1, 14:00
    - Kodak HC-110 1+31, 8:00
    - Rodinal 1+25, 8:00
    - Rodinal 1+50, 17:00
- Svema FN 64
  - Apparently Dracula 35 from the Film Photography Project is this.
  - Difficult to load and wind in the K-1000, and apparently subject to breakage; both are apparently because the film base is thin.
  - Normal development procedure: not yet established.
  - Rolls developed:
    - Rodinal 1+75, 60:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1227.
    - Rodinal 1+77, 60:00, 40x/10x:
      - 1259.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 50:00, 20x/5x:
      - 1280.
      - 1287,
      - 1295.
    - Rodinal 1+100, 50:00, 10x/1x:
      - 1288: needs more agitation.
- Wolfen DN21
  - An alternate name for Orwo DN21 (q.v.), which is manufactured in Wolfen, Germany.
- Wolfen NP100
  - See under Orwo Wolfen NP100.
- Wolfen PF2
  - See under Orwo Wolfen PF2.
- Wolfen UN54
  - An alternate name for Orwo UN54 (q.v.), which is manufactured in Wolfen, Germany.